Business models combine across the supply chain.
By Jack Harding
I recently participated in a panel hosted by TSMC. The other panelists represented EDA, IP and Foundry market segments. We were asked to comment on new business models as a means to facilitate more design-starts in companies large and small and, otherwise, make it easier to be in this business with increasing NREs and greater complexity.
To my delight the EDA guy talked about software as a service. The IP guy talked about novel payment plans and strategic deals that concentrate the efficient development of basic IP into a few suppliers. The foundry guy from TSMC talked about how his company isn’t a bank. Well, two out of three isn’t bad. But he did say the foundry is receptive to new business and payment ideas that put more chips in production solving more problems.
These are all admirable goals and strategies, but all of these have to come together for the model to truly work. The new terminology is value chain producer, which combines SaaS, IP databases and services, unique financing to amortize NRE into production, finance WIP and manage die banks and other things that save the customer money.
It’s great the industry is recognizing that innovation must come in our business models, as well as our laboratories. It’s great that TSMC is stepping up to its leadership role for these discussions. And it’s not so bad that the VCP model has emerged as a way of taking advantage of all of these models.
–Jack Harding is the CEO of eSilicon
Increasing complexity, disaggregation, and continued feature shrinks add to problem; oversight is scant.
Academia, industry partnerships ramp to entice undergrads into hardware engineering.
Packaging and inspection companies draw funding; 124 startups raise over $2.3 billion.
Pitches continue to decrease, but new tooling and technologies are required.
Buried features and re-entrant geometries drive application-specific metrology solutions.
While terms often are used interchangeably, they are very different technologies with different challenges.
Technology and business issues mean it won’t replace EUV, but photonics, biotech and other markets provide plenty of room for growth.
Commercial chiplet marketplaces are still on the distant horizon, but companies are getting an early start with more limited partnerships.
Existing tools can be used for RISC-V, but they may not be the most effective or efficient. What else is needed?
How customization, complexity, and geopolitical tensions are upending the global status quo.
The industry is gaining ground in understanding how aging affects reliability, but more variables make it harder to fix.
Key pivot and innovation points in semiconductor manufacturing.
Tools become more specific for Si/SiGe stacks, 3D NAND, and bonded wafer pairs.
Leave a Reply