A comprehensive comparison of radar and PIR technologies.
As radar technology continues to advance, it offers an increasingly broad range of capabilities, making it a viable alternative to traditional passive infrared (PIR) sensors. With radar’s enhanced features, it’s essential to reassess whether PIR remains the best choice for your specific application or if radar’s advantages can bring greater value.
The purpose of this material is to provide a comprehensive comparison of radar and PIR technologies, enabling you to make an informed decision about which technology best suits your specific requirements.
Fig. 1: Radar technologies. Source: Infineon
Before we move further into the details of two solutions, the following chart highlights the advantages of radar technology over PIR sensors, addressing some of the challenges associated with PIR in various use cases:
Fig. 2: Radar vs PIR advantages. Source: Infineon
“When designing sensor systems for detecting proximity or motion information, designers must carefully balance flexibility and cost considerations in their technology choices.”
The suitability of radar technology for your project depends on a delicate balance of functionality and cost considerations. To help you make an informed decision, let’s delve into the characteristics of different sensor types.
Traditional motion sensors have long relied on Passive Infrared (PIR) technology. This approach offers a cost-effective and straightforward way to detect objects by sensing their heat signature when they enter the sensor’s range. PIR sensors work by detecting changes in infrared radiation and converting these changes into a voltage signal. This signal is then compared to a predetermined threshold to trigger a response, such as switching on a light or activating an alarm.
Radar technology leverages the Doppler principle to accurately determine an object’s motion, speed, and direction. While implementing radar can be complex, its capabilities extend far beyond simple object detection. Here’s how it works: the radar transmits a millimeter-wave (mmWave) waveform, which bounces off an object within its field of view. The reflected waveform is then received by the radar transceiver. The received signal exhibits a frequency difference, known as the Doppler frequency, which enables the detection of movement and velocity.
Depending on the type of radar implementation, such as Continuous Wave (CW) Doppler or Frequency Modulated CW (FMCW), additional object parameters can be extracted. For instance, the distance to the sensor can be calculated, and with an additional antenna, the exact position or coordinates of the object within the field of view can be pinpointed.
When deciding whether radar is the best fit for a particular application, designers must carefully weigh critical features against cost. Factors such as range, object sensitivity, and environmental factors influence sensor performance.
While PIR sensors are inexpensive, radar technologies are decreasing in cost and becoming more compact and simple to design. Radar solutions can range from simple motion detection to complex imaging radar systems.
Fig. 3: Comparison of PIR versus radar by technology. Source: Infineon
Sensor features will dictate technology choice. Is distance important? If so, consider that PIR sensors, commonly found in in-home motion detectors or driveway lights, have a limited range of roughly 10 meters. In contrast, radar technology can detect objects at distances ranging from within 10 meters to over 50 meters, depending on the radar signature of the object. This extended range makes radar an attractive solution for applications where PIR technology falls short. For instance, radar can be used for outdoor lighting control in streets, parking lots, or campuses, covering larger areas with the right antenna scheme.
While PIR sensors are inexpensive, they come with significant performance limitations. One major drawback is their inability to detect motionless objects, as they rely on monitoring changes in an object’s infrared radiation. Environmental factors also pose a challenge, particularly in outdoor applications where snow, dirt, and other conditions can degrade PIR sensor performance. Heat is another well-known limitation, as high ambient temperatures (around 98-99°F) can render the sensor unable to detect human movement. Aesthetic design considerations are also important, as PIR sensors require a semi-transparent plastic radome or cover to allow infrared energy to pass through, which can be prone to dust and dirt accumulation, affecting performance. Furthermore, PIR sensors are susceptible to false detections when non-human objects enter the sensor’s view, adding to their limitations.
When embarking on a new sensor design, it’s worth considering an intelligent sensor that offers positive tradeoffs to justify a minimal cost increase. Radar sensors, for instance, can be designed as simple Doppler-based motion detectors, using a straightforward algorithm to determine if an object is approaching or moving away from the sensor. Moreover, speed calculation becomes a natural byproduct of the Doppler shift, which can be used to calculate velocity. By leveraging the Doppler shift, the radar transceiver provides the processing unit with the necessary frequency data to determine movement.
For more complex implementations, an FMCW (Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave) scheme can be employed to monitor both stationary and moving objects, tracking their movement and distance in real-time. Design flexibility is a significant advantage of radar sensors, enabling adjustments to the sensor’s field pattern and aesthetic appearance to suit specific application needs. Radar sensors can be discreetly integrated behind walls or fixtures, making them ideal for security applications where motion detection is required without visible sensors. Moreover, radar sensors can be combined with optical cameras, using radar as a long-distance trigger to activate camera functionality.
The high-precision mmWave radar offers a host of advantages over the traditional passive infrared (PIR) technology in presence detection applications. These include greater accuracy and more precise measurement of static human body, especially when sitting still in front of the television. Additionally, the radar can penetrate non-metallic surfaces without opening holes, making it more convenient for product design.
To determine if a radar solution meets the specific needs of their application, engineers can explore different reference designs and development platforms. Infineon Technologies, for instance, offers a range of solutions to facilitate experimentation. The XENSIV BGT60LTR11AIP 60 GHz Radar sensor is a simple and compact development platform for creating intelligent motion sensors, with autonomous operation and no algorithm development required
By leveraging such platforms, engineers can quickly and easily test and validate their radar-based designs, paving the way for successful implementation.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |  |
Leave a Reply