Guest Blogger Chuck Alpert talks about mastering the other matrix, and why all the confusion with Neo.
As I’ve often stated, DAC is very much a team effort. Way back in week five I introduced Chuck Alpert, who is vice chair of the conference. Among other things, this title means Chuck will chair DAC 53 in Austin in 2016. Not that he hasn’t been busy with DAC 52. Chuck worked very hard to put together this year’s conference matrix, basically the overall conference schedule. It was big job, handled with his usually energy and good cheer, familiar to all who know him. I asked Chuck to be guest blogger this week to say more:
While living in Los Angeles in the early 1990s, I noticed the fairly common practice of strangers approaching other strangers and informing them that, “You look like (insert celebrity name here).” I’m not sure why people did this. Maybe everyone in L.A. is looking for a brush with fame, however minor. As far as I can tell, there were few links to celebs in my graduate computer science program at UCLA. Still, walking around Westwood I heard more than once that I looked like Keanu Reeves.
It was many years later when Reeves (or more accurately, Neo) mastered the Matrix. Is it a coincidence that now it’s my job as DAC 52 vice chair to tame the complexity of the conference matrix, the schedule that drives the entire conference program that attendees use as a guide? Neo of course had three movies over the course of four years to get the job done. We’re trying to whip this into shape in under a year, and without the benefit of any red pills.
Overall, we’re on the right track and I have progress to report. The takeaway is that next year’s conference schedule will be streamlined and simplified. There is so much going on at DAC that we need to make it easy for attendees to figure out when and where things are taking place. Here are some of the key features to watch for in next year’s conference schedule:
There is much more about the improved DAC matrix that we will share as we put the program together. For now, know that we are not wedded to the past. The executive committee seeks to constantly improve DAC by keeping what works and changing what doesn’t. I’ve done as much myself as I’ve harkened back to my time in L.A. When the Reeves/Neo comparison has come up through the years — which, okay, it doesn’t very often anymore — I’ve always laughed along. However illusory, that link to the Matrix star isn’t so bad, especially given the trilogy’s near universal appeal in the world of tech. What I rarely mention is that back in grad school I also was frequently compared to Jason Gould, Barbara Streisand’s son. Not that I have anything against Gould or Streisand, but I’d take Neo & Co. over “How Deep is the Ocean” any day.
Leave a Reply