The three key “care-abouts” of choosing hardware-assisted verification.
Hardware-assisted verification and prototyping has become a mandatory requirement to allow design teams to gain confidence that a chip tape out can be initiated. The choice of the right hardware-accelerated engine is driven by its productivity, predictability, and use-model versatility, all impacting the key concern of users how to remove bugs. The XP Platform allows design teams to get to the point at which they are confident enough to tape out much faster, often shaving off two to four months off development cycles.
To view this white paper, click here.
Experts at the Table, part 1: Shrinking features isn’t enough anymore. The big challenge now is how to achieve economies of scale and minimize complex integration issues.
Rising costs and gaps in equipment emerge as technology scales; new tools under development.
Explosion of data is forcing significant changes in where processing is done.
Researchers digging into ways around the von Neumann bottleneck.
Showing that a processor core adheres to a specification becomes more difficult when the specification is extensible.
Optimizing complex chips requires decisions about overall system architecture, and memory is a key variable.
Why data scrubbing and social issues could limit the speed of adoption and the usefulness of this technology.
Wally Rhines, Mentor’s CEO Emeritus, points to big shifts caused by AI, customization, uncertainty in the global economy and a changing customer base.
Smaller features and AI are creating system-level issues, but traditional ways of solving these problems don’t always work.
Agile development is gaining traction for developing hardware testbenches, but challenges remain.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Leave a Reply