An ASIC and system vendor perspective.
This paper examines the achievements and future of SoC design methodology and design flow from the viewpoints of an in- house EDA team of an ASIC and system vendor. We initially discuss the problems of the design productivity gap caused by the SoC’s complexity and the timing closure caused by deep submicron technology. To solve these two problems, we propose a C-based SoC design environment that features integrated high-level synthesis and verification tools. A high-level synthesis system is introduced using various successful industrial design examples, and its advantages and drawbacks are discussed. We then look at the future directions of this system. The high-level verification environment consists of mixed-level hardware/software co-simulator, formal and semi- formal verifiers, and test-bench generators. The verification tools are tightly integrated with the high-level synthesis system and take advantage of information from the synthesis system. Then, we discuss the possibility of incorporating physical design feature into the C-based SoC design environment. Finally, we describe our global vision for an SoC architecture and SoC design methodology.
To read more, click here.
Interest in the open-source ISA marks a significant shift among chipmakers, but it will require continued industry support to be successful.
Slowdown due to impact on timing, and dependencies between power, thermal and timing that may not be caught by signoff tools.
Access to source code makes it attractive for custom applications, but gaps remain in the tool flow and in software.
SoC bandwidth, integration expand as data centers use more FPGAs for machine learning.
Problems won’t derail next-gen litho, but could limit use and affect schedules.
AI-enabled systems are being designed to process more data locally as device scaling benefits decline.
Access to source code makes it attractive for custom applications, but gaps remain in the tool flow and in software.
Growing volume of data and limited improvements in performance create new opportunities for approaches that never got off the ground.
What happens when companies are combined? The outcome often isn’t as good as the announcement.
As complexity and device sizes rise, so does the need for an on-chip network.
Experts at the Table, part 1: Are we looking to solve the wrong problems? Where does parallelization work best and why.
Synopsys Co-CEO Aart de Geus explains why systemic complexity will be the next big challenge, and what that means for EDA and the chip industry.
IP reuse has reduced the urgency for a higher level of abstraction in complex system-level design, but that still could change.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Leave a Reply