Humidity resistance and reliability of different packaging structures is analyzed, including the high/low temperature and temperature cycle reliability and the thermal characteristics in different humidity environments.
Abstract
“Packaging process is an indispensable part in the process of electronic components manufacturing, and its packaging quality directly affects the nominal power, reliability and other functions of the product in the subsequent application process. Through the research on the humidity resistance reliability of different packaging structures, C-Mount packaging structure, TO packaging structure and butterfly packaging structure, three common packaging structures are introduced and analyzed first, and then studied the humidity resistance reliability of different packaging structures by analyzing the high and low temperature and temperature cycle reliability of different packaging structures and the thermal characteristics of different packaging structures in different humidity environments research. The results show that the butterfly package structure has the best humidity resistance reliability followed by TO package structure and C-Mount package structure was the worst.”
Find the technical paper here (fee). Published 10/2021.
H. Xuan, Z. Yu, H. Wu, W. Ding and G. Gao, “Research on the Humidity Resistance Reliability of Different Packaging Structures,” 2021 22nd International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology (ICEPT), 2021, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ICEPT52650.2021.9567979.
Increasing complexity, disaggregation, and continued feature shrinks add to problem; oversight is scant.
Academia, industry partnerships ramp to entice undergrads into hardware engineering.
Packaging and inspection companies draw funding; 124 startups raise over $2.3 billion.
Pitches continue to decrease, but new tooling and technologies are required.
Buried features and re-entrant geometries drive application-specific metrology solutions.
While terms often are used interchangeably, they are very different technologies with different challenges.
Technology and business issues mean it won’t replace EUV, but photonics, biotech and other markets provide plenty of room for growth.
Commercial chiplet marketplaces are still on the distant horizon, but companies are getting an early start with more limited partnerships.
Existing tools can be used for RISC-V, but they may not be the most effective or efficient. What else is needed?
How customization, complexity, and geopolitical tensions are upending the global status quo.
The industry is gaining ground in understanding how aging affects reliability, but more variables make it harder to fix.
Key pivot and innovation points in semiconductor manufacturing.
Tools become more specific for Si/SiGe stacks, 3D NAND, and bonded wafer pairs.
Leave a Reply