Home
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Implementing Fast Barriers For A Shared-Memory Cluster Of 1024 RISC-V Cores

popularity

A technical paper titled “Fast Shared-Memory Barrier Synchronization for a 1024-Cores RISC-V Many-Core Cluster” was published by researchers at ETH Zürich and Università di Bologna.

“Synchronization is likely the most critical performance killer in shared-memory parallel programs. With the rise of multi-core and many-core processors, the relative impact on performance and energy overhead of synchronization is bound to grow. This paper focuses on barrier synchronization for TeraPool, a cluster of 1024 RISC-V processors with non-uniform memory access to a tightly coupled 4MB shared L1 data memory. We compare the synchronization strategies available in other multi-core and many-core clusters to identify the optimal native barrier kernel for TeraPool. We benchmark a set of optimized barrier implementations and evaluate their performance in the framework of the widespread fork-join Open-MP style programming model. We test parallel kernels from the signal-processing and telecommunications domain, achieving less than 10% synchronization overhead over the total runtime for problems that fit TeraPool’s L1 memory. By fine-tuning our tree barriers, we achieve 1.6x speed-up with respect to a naive central counter barrier and just 6.2% overhead on a typical 5G application, including a challenging multistage synchronization kernel. To our knowledge, this is the first work where shared-memory barriers are used for the synchronization of a thousand processing elements tightly coupled to shared data memory.”

Find the technical paper here. Published July 2023 (preprint).

Bertuletti, Marco, Samuel Riedel, Yichao Zhang, Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli, and Luca Benini. “Fast Shared-Memory Barrier Synchronization for a 1024-Cores RISC-V Many-Core Cluster.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10248 (2023).

Related Reading
Selecting The Right RISC-V Core
Ensuring that your product contains the best RISC-V processor core is not an easy decision, and current tools are not up to the task.



Leave a Reply


(Note: This name will be displayed publicly)