Metrology Of Thin Resist For High NA EUVL

Despite the impact of thinning resist materials, it is possible to find appropriate settings to strengthen the metrology quality output.


One of the many constrains of high numerical aperture extreme ultraviolet lithography (High NA EUVL) is related to resist thickness. In fact, one of the consequences of moving from current 0.33NA to 0.55NA (high NA) is the depth of focus (DOF) reduction. In addition, as the resist feature lines shrink down to 8nm half pitch, it is essential to limit the aspect ratio to avoid pattern collapse. The direct consequence of such a situation is that a resist thickness of 30nm, usually used for 32nm pitch dense line/space (LS), will not be suitable for 16nm pitch, where the target thickness is expected to be 15nm thickness or less to ensure a similar aspect ratio. The question we need to answer is how the resist thickness reduction will impact the various metrology techniques needed to properly set up a process.

To address this question, a set of wafers using both chemical amplified resist (CAR) and metal oxide resist (MOR) at different thicknesses and with different types of underlayer have been generated for LS patterns at 32nm pitch. We first investigated the impact of film thickness by scanning electron microscope (SEM) on the imaging of CAR resist lines. To start with, our current best-known methods (BKMs) were used to acquire the SEM images. As resist thickness decreases, noise level and image contrast are observed to degrade dramatically. Such an image quality degradation may directly impact the quality of the CD measurements both in terms of accuracy and precision.

In this paper we investigated the thin resist wafer set described above using various techniques, such as critical dimension scanning electron microscope (CD SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), low voltage SEM (LV SEM), scatterometry, pattern shift response (PSR), and optical defect inspection. The impact of the resist thickness is estimated for each approach, and optimal settings were investigated to minimize the relative impact on metrology. Our results indicated that, in most cases, alternative operation conditions and BKM settings, sometimes drastically different from the usual operation condition, must be used to guarantee the metrology requirements. Our results show that, despite the impact of thinning resist materials, it is possible to find appropriate settings to strengthen the metrology quality output.

Authors: Gian Francesco Lorussoa, Christophe Berala, Janusz Bogdanowicza, Danilo De Simonea, Mahmudul Hasana, Christiane Jehoula, Alain Moussaa, Mohamed Saiba, Mohamed Zidana, Joren Severia, Vincent Trufferta, Dieter Van Den Heuvela, Alex Goldenshteinb, Kevin Houchensb, Gaetano Santorob, Daniel Fischerc, Angelika Muellenderc, Joey Hungd, Roy Koretd, Igor Turovetsd, Kit Ausschnitte, Chris Mackf, Tsuyoshi Kondog, Tomoyasu Shohjohg, Masami Ikotag, Anne-Laure Charleya, Philippe Leraya

aimec, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium;
bApplied Materials, 8, Prof. A. D. Bergman St 4, Rehovot, Israel;
cCarl Zeiss SMT GmbH, Carl-Zeiss-Straße 22, 73447 Oberkochen, Germany;
dNOVA, 5 David Fikes St., Rehovot 7632805, Israel;
eKAC, Round Pond, Maine, USA;
fFractilia, Austin Texas, USA;
gHitachi High-Tech Corp., Japan.

PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE, Event: SPIE Advanced Lithography + Patterning, 2022, San Jose, California, United States

Click here to read more.

Leave a Reply

(Note: This name will be displayed publicly)