Evolving Ethernet into a lossless, low-latency, deterministic transport built for the way AI accelerators actually talk to each other.
Every generation of AI infrastructure has redefined what “the network” means. In today’s training clusters — scaling from hundreds to hundreds of thousands of accelerators — the interconnect is no longer a supporting actor. It has become a first-order determinant of system throughput, utilization, and cost per token. Accelerators inside these systems don’t just move data; they synchronize on it, step after step. When even a small fraction of that traffic is late, expensive compute sits idle waiting.
That reality is forcing a rethink of the fabric itself. The result is ESUN — Ethernet for Scale-Up Networking — an open, OCP-defined effort to evolve Ethernet into a lossless, low-latency, deterministic transport built for the way AI accelerators actually talk to each other.

Fig. 1: AI accelerator clusters need tightly orchestrated interconnects to scale efficiently.
Classic Ethernet was engineered as a best-effort fabric. It tolerates occasional loss, retries, and jitter because most cloud workloads can absorb them. AI training cannot.
AI performance is gated by tail latency — the slowest packet in a collective operation. Even if 99% of traffic arrives on time, one delayed packet can stall an all-reduce and idle the entire cluster. Packet loss compounds the problem: retransmissions inject additional delay and variability that ripple across synchronized workloads.
At scale, these inefficiencies translate directly into wasted bandwidth, higher power draw, and rising infrastructure cost. When clusters grow to hundreds of thousands of accelerators, the math simply doesn’t hold.
From an architect’s point of view, the goal of a scale-up network is almost the opposite of what Ethernet was built for: the network should disappear. Accelerators should behave as if they’re inside a single, unified machine — communication that feels local rather than remote. That requires a fabric that is not only fast, but predictable, efficient, and tightly coupled to the compute domain.
Ethernet does include congestion tools — PFC and ECN — but these were designed for general-purpose data centers, not the tightly coupled, latency-sensitive traffic patterns of an AI pod. At scale-up distances and data rates, three limitations become structural:
These gaps have pushed some architectures toward proprietary interconnects. Those solve the immediate problem but bring their own baggage: ecosystem fragmentation, reduced flexibility, and long-term vendor risk.

Fig. 2: ESUN vs standard Ethernet: Architectural enhancements.
Rather than starting over, the industry is adapting Ethernet where it needs to change and preserving what already works. That’s the core philosophy behind ESUN.
What stays intact matters as much as what’s new:
The enhancements themselves are surgical:
The net effect: AI systems get Ethernet’s scale, interoperability, and ecosystem economics without inheriting assumptions written for a different era.
The most visible change is at the packet itself. Where standard Ethernet carries 28–48 bytes of IP header overhead, ESUN replaces it with a compact 4-byte header. In a workload dominated by small, frequent messages, that difference translates directly into higher effective bandwidth and lower per-packet latency.

Fig. 3: IP header vs. ESUN header.
Nothing critical is lost in the trim. Traffic prioritization, congestion signaling, and load balancing are all still there — just implemented more efficiently for the scale-up domain.
ESUN introduces two mechanisms that push determinism down into the link layer, where it belongs for scale-up:
Together, LLR and CBFC give ESUN its signature profile: lossless, low-latency, bandwidth-efficient — with Ethernet’s openness and interoperability intact.

Fig. 4: ESUN solution.
To help SoC teams move from spec to silicon quickly, Synopsys has introduced the industry’s first complete ESUN IP solution spanning both Layer 1 and Layer 2 — a pre-verified stack designed to work together out of the box.
The solution includes:
By delivering the full stack, Synopsys collapses much of the integration burden — and integration risk — that typically comes with assembling high-speed networking IP from multiple sources.
As AI models continue to scale, the demands on the fabric will only intensify. Networks will need to be fast — but also predictable, efficient, and scalable enough to keep hundreds of thousands of accelerators productively busy. Backed by more than 175 companies, including the leading hyperscalers and silicon vendors, ESUN represents the point at which Ethernet converges on that reality.
Synopsys’ ESUN IP solution is one piece of a broader HPC IP portfolio built to support the full AI system stack:
Together, these building blocks give architects a foundation where compute, memory, and connectivity scale in lockstep — which is exactly what the next generation of AI infrastructure will demand.
Leave a Reply