Home
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Why Co-Packaged Optics Should be Viewed as an Architectural Commitment (UW-Madison, MIT et al.)

popularity

A new technical paper, “3D optoelectronics and co-packaged optics: when solving the wrong problems stalls deployment,” by the University of Wisconsin, MIT, and Invictus Innovation EV Technology.

Abstract

“The rapid growth of AI and accelerator-driven workloads is forcing a fundamental rethinking of optical interconnect architectures in datacenters. Co-packaged optics and three-dimensional photonic integration have emerged as promising solutions to overcome the energy and bandwidth limitations of electrical I/O. Yet, as optics move closer to compute, packaging, thermal management, and system-level robustness increasingly dominate performance and scalability. Here, we argue that co-packaged optics should not be viewed as a component-level optimization, but as an architectural commitment that reshapes the boundaries between photonics, electronics, and system design. We examine how heterogeneous integration strategies, chiplet-based optics, and emerging packaging platforms redefine scaling laws for AI systems, often introducing trade-offs that are underappreciated in device-centric analyses. Looking forward, we discuss why standardization, serviceability, and thermal-aware co-design will be decisive in determining whether co-packaged optics can transition from early deployment to widespread adoption in AI-scale datacenters.”

Find the technical paper here. March 2026.

Yi, Yasha, and Danny Wilkerson. “3D optoelectronics and co-packaged optics: when solving the wrong problems stalls deployment.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.21313 (2026).



Leave a Reply


(Note: This name will be displayed publicly)